The weather models war will take place [Update]

I relayais in December 2018 an excellent issue published on the blog of our friends Geogarage, which are a permanent duty of a press review of the best foreign articles about mapping, meteorology, and generally all matters relating to marine navigation. Here is a translation freely adapted and commented in French.

The new American weather model shone during Hurricane Lane

It is well established that the European weather model IFS (¹) the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (²), produces on average the most accurate weather forecasts in the world. For years, American model Global Forecasting System (GFS), managed by NOAA National Weather Service (³) , only ranked as the third.

The "bad student" rank of the American GFS model has attracted the attention of Congress, which has appropriated money to the Weather Service to improve USA’s weather modeling on multiple occasions. Already, after Cyclone Sandy in 2012, whose final trajectory upon New York had been only anticipated by the European model, the US Congress, by an additional budget, enabled the NWS to make big progress with successful start to the GFS redesign early 2015 ().

In addition, the US administrationhas stated that building the best prediction model in the world is a “top priority.”.

The future forecast model GFS-FV3

A new analysis of model performance during Hurricane Lane, which unloaded historic amounts of rain on Hawaii’s Big Island, shows that the Weather Service may be making progress.

The NWS has developed a new version of GFS, known for FV3 (Finite Volume Cubed-Sphere dynamical core), which he calls "the next generation global forecasting system." Although still considered experimental, the FV3 produced the most consistently accurate predictions of Lane's track. The NWS said :

"We got a table from the weather service showing the tracking errors for each of the models at different times. Trajectory errors tend to be important for forecasting the position of the storm to several days, but they decrease over time. "

  • The FV3 produced the most accurate forecasts (or lowest error path) made between four (96 hours steps) and five (120 hours steps) days in the future. It was neck and neck with the forecasts of the European model and the National Hurricane Center in 72 early hours.
  • The European model ECMWF included large errors in its forecasts four and five days, but he showed talent for which he is known within 72 hours steps (3 days).
  • The British model MET, which is the second most accurate model in the world, managed by the UK Met Office in Exeter office, has lagged the performance of forecasts of European models, Hurricane Center and FV3 at all times.
  • The current operational version of the US model GFS practically had the worst prediction of performance at every step.
  • The American model HWRF, which is a specialized model for hurricanes, also performed poorly, ranking second to last. Some of the input data from the GFS, which is why both models have comparatively poor performance.

Although the FV3’s results were very promising for Hurricane Lane, at the moment they only reflect a very limited case. To be convinced that this new modeling system could reduce the gap with the European model, we will need to see such performance repeated, storm after storm and in everyday weather situations, from the tropics to the poles.

[Update 12 June 2019] This Wednesday 12 June, GFS model-FV3 has just been announced as operational.

Le noyau dynamique FV3 divise l'atmosphère en petits cubes disposés sur une grille et calcule les changements de vents et de pression dans chaque cube dans le cadre de la prévision d'un modèle. Les modèles utilisant le FV3 ont la capacité de zoomer sur les systèmes de tempête pour améliorer les prévisions. Ici, nous voyons une image satellite de l'ouragan Sandy avec une version étirée de la grille de sphères cubiques de FV3, zoomée sur l'ouragan.

Credit NOAA

The FV3 dynamical core divides the atmosphere into small cubes arranged on a grid and computes the changes in winds and pressure within each cube as part of a model's forecast. Models using the FV3 have the capability to zoom in on storm systems to improve predictions. Here, we see a satellite image of Hurricane Sandy with a stretched version of FV3's cubed sphere grid, zoomed in on the hurricane.

–––
(¹) Integrated Forecast System, commonly called CEP
(²) In English : European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF)
(³) U.S.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(New GFS grid 0.25° model

–––

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail

4 Replies to “The war of weather models will take place [Update]”

  1. Hello,
    This appears to be great news if you look at the isolated case of this study, but there are similar studies (but statistics for once) on a greater number of comparisons and the most used settings (navigation at least) such as strength and wind direction at some point in time?
    Cordially

  2. Re: [Update 12 June, 2019]
    Do I understand it correctly that from now on when I download grib data based on GFS (in Weather4D 2.0 and others) it is effectively FV3 data? Or will apps will be updated upon.

  3. It must be recognized that Mediterranean GFS are sinking by WRF. Unfortunately in Thailand where I sail right now I do not know if and where to get the WRF!
    Thank you for this very rewarding Article! Cdlt

Comments are closed.